What If George Bush………..stopped the U.S. from investing in wind energy?

    Today, New York Senator Schmuck Schumer came out and opposed the use of American stimulus dollars to purchase wind turbines that are to be used in generating wind energy.

Sounds bad, right?

Well most everything that Chuck does is pretty bad, but in this case he is right.

Wind energy is good and I believe we should employ as much and wherever is most practical. However; in this instance, the already much abused and wasted stimulus money that is suppose to spend us into prosperity while propelling us into debt, is now being used to buy wind turbines from China…… so much for the Administration’s promise to make sure that American jobs are not shipped oversees.So I agree with Chucky on this. We should not spend this money on “these” wind turbines.

But what if George Bush did that?

What would be the reaction if George Bush came out, made a scene, and announced that he refuses to buy “these” important components for incorporating environmentally sound wind energy ?

They would crucify him !!!!

If George Bush did that, the radical leftists would claim “that this is the most anti-environmental President the nation has”. They would claim he is raping the environment and standing in the way of progress.

If G.W. Bush failed to allow the U.S. to purchase the tools for wind energy, that would be the headline the liberal statists run with. They would claimed he refused to move ahead with renewable enrgyan put it  in commercials and mailings.   They would try to make sure that anyone and everyone was made to believe it.  If President Bush took the same position as Chuck Schumer, the radical leftists in Congress would not be honest and say that the President stopped the purchase of wind turbines because they were from China. They would simply say he stopped the purchase.

This is one WIGBDT, that’s begs the question WTF?

ACCOUNTABILITY IN POLITICS. It Starts Here!

  WIGBDT?  What is that?

Don’t get scared. They are not letters that represent part of the never ending alphabet soup of letters that seems to grow everyday in an attempt to describe alternative lifestyles. You know, like LGB, which was once identified the lesbian, gay & bisexual community. Than it was expanded to LGBT which signified lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. But the politically correct left didn’t just stop there. They eventually added the letter Q to signify “questioning” and/or “queer”, as if any of the existing letters weren’t already being used to signify something queer or questionable.

But wait! Keep your pants on. It gets better.

There were still some who felt left out because their particular sexual preference or identity was not given its own initial. So along came the letter I for “intersexual”. So now the alternative community is identified by the acronym LGBTQI. But that still may not be satisfactory. There are those who demand that the alternative lifestyle acronym have letters representing “asexual”, “polyamorous” and/or “pansexual” and even the letter O for omnisexual.

The trend has me bewildered and to be quite frank, it has me scared. I don’t know what half of those sexual variations or lifestyles are and I am afraid to find out. It makes one really understand how much of the world is still truly unexplored and I am beginning to think it should remain that way. I’ m not the only one stunned by the gender bending, letter adding trend. One group of creative magazine editors and columnists got together and created the acronym FABGLITTER. It stands for “Fetish”, “Allies”, “Bisexual”, “Gay”, “Lesbian”, “Intersexed”, “Transgender”, “Transexual Engendering”, “Revolution”.

That about covers it I guess. Accept for the letter representing one conspicuously absent sexual preference and lifestyle. That being the letter S. As in “Straight”. Leave it to liberals crying about inclusiveness and preaching tolerance and acceptance to leave out straight people.

But where were we? Oh yeah. “WIGBDT”.

That stands for “What If George Bush Did That?”

The purpose behind this site is to focus on something that I have concluded is a staple of liberalism———–Hypocrisy.

Liberals lives in a parallel universe governed by double standards and deceitful disinformation. This is not a new realization for me. In fact, each day that goes by, a liberal somewhere in America, convinces me of this belief more and more. It could be a liberal from Congress or the Administration, or one from the state I call home, New Jersey. But the segment of society that is a most prolific provider of material that proves me right is the media, specifically the mainstream media. Or as I call it, the “lamestream media”.

The lamestream media is a veritable propaganda machine. It is filled with liberal lunatics like Keith Olberman, Rachel Maddow, Katie Couric, Larry King, Wolf Blitzer, Jack Cafferty, Joy Behar, Chris Mathews, and an endless assortment of even more partisan hacks who parade around as enlightened educators, here to set us and the record straight. Between the lamestream media and newspapers and Hollywood, the collective din of their distortions, lies and claims that are devoid of all fact and disconnected from reality, it is enough to make a sane person scream. The problem though, is that, if I screamed every time a liberal lied and every time they applied a double standard that proved their inherent hypocrisy, men in white suits with nets would carry me away.

So rather than have my freedom restricted any more than the liberal regime in Washington, DC. is already seeking to do, I have started “What If George Bush Did That? “

Here we can document the hypocrisy of the left. The ones in Congress, in the Obama Administration, in state legislatures and local governments and of course in the world of entertainment news.

We will compare how the “non-partisan” news media covers President Obama and how they covered President George W. Bush. Together, let’s document the double standards that people like Rosie O’Donnell and those pseudo intellectual coffee klatch queens on “The View” spew. Let WIGBDT know about it whenever the leftist and statists demonstrate their hypocrisy by offering praise for President Obama after he does the same thing that they once criticized and mocked President Bush for doing.

We will delve into things like how the left would have dealt with President Bush if he called Hillary Clinton a “pig”, as President Obama did of Sarah Palin. There is just so much hypocrisy to discuss though.  

Democrats have hypocrisy dripping off of themselves. They are drowning in hypocrisy and the truth is, the more liberal a Democrat is, the more hypocritical they get. There are just so many examples of their hypocrisy. So many, that it may be impossible for me, just one person, to document it all and break it all down.

That is why I want you to become an official member of the WIGBDT Club.

Join us and submit your own detailed analysis of an act of hypocrisy that liberals initiate or participate in. You can do it! All you have to do is ask yourself a simple question every time that President Obama does something? Ask yourself, “What if George Bush did that?” Once you’ve done that, write about it and it send to me, Kempite——your Information Czar.

Look at it as a kind of “fishy@whitehouse.gov” operation, but in reverse. Instead of the authorities having you report suspicious opinions to them, you submit the authorities suspicious and hypocritical actions to us at “What If George Bush Did That?” (WIGBDT).

When you have your proof of hypocrisy (POH) evidence documented, send it to me, Kempite, at LiberalsRlosers@aol.com.

Yeah that’s right, LiberalsRlosers@aol.com.

I am no hypocrite and if you haven’t been able to tell yet, I am not afraid to speak the truth and call it like it is……………LOL (Look Out Losers).

And don’t forget to join our official What If George Bush Did That? Facebook Group.  There you will be able to receive updates and discuss the issues of liberal hypocrisy at length

So what are you waiting for? Let’s get’ er done! Send in your POH’s. Hold liberals accountable and make sure that they apply one standard to all Presidents, with dignity and honesty for all.